Shopping has become a mobile affair and today’s shoppers demand a lot from mobile to meet their needs. Shoppers are looking for information, recommendations and price comparisons, but those are just the basics. As technology becomes more savvy, so do shoppers. It’s similar to car shopping really, you buy for the function but the amenities and added features are what draw you in and seal the deal. Mobile has to meet that same need today, as shoppers look for it to meet them wherever they are in whatever stage they’re at. Hence the birth of showrooming as one of the newest trends, where shoppers engage their mobile to compare prices on the same product at different retailers. Retailers are increasingly fighting to keep shoppers in stores and engaged in immediate point of purchase endeavors. A local Oregon car dealership, Dick’s Mackenzie Ford, tells shoppers in its commercial to check online and then come to their dealership. They claim that if you make the trip, they’ll make the deal. Attempts like this to directly combat showrooming are not unusual.
Target is now taking on competitors like Amazon in offering a price match guarantee
http://bit.ly/XQrbK1
. Geared towards assuring shoppers that they are getting the best deal around, the process offers hope. However, utilizing it is not the most user-friendly process around. Customers must bring in a purchase with proof of current price or the original Target receipt and proof of current price to the guest services department. What’s wrong with this scenario? The last thing people want to do is wait in line and that’s exactly what they’ll be doing here. If Target’s going to combat the effects of mobile it’s also got to learn to utilize mobile. Customers are increasingly looking for added features with mobile, and turning this process into a mobile process would satisfy that urge. Just as virtual checkout has caught on, Target customers should be able to scan their purchase or receipt barcode and provide a link as proof of current price. Then the guest services team could virtually approve or deny these claims through email or through a store app. With mobile, convenience is going to win the day.
This has already been proven in a study by Latitude called Next-Gen Retail: Mobile & Beyond
http://bit.ly/ZTprlD
. Smartphone users ages 20-59 from the U.S. and U.K. were included in this study, with 65% of them being dual owners (also owning a tablet). The study found that 20-29 year-olds prefer smartphones to laptops for transactions. It also noted that shoppers are increasingly expecting mobile to meet them with real-time offers. Location-aware communications make it more likely they’ll visit a store’s website or physical location soon, with 1 in 5 saying they’re more likely to make a purchase or a pit-stop at the store that day. As mobile rises to meet this, more demands come into view. 79% are interested in receiving digital content delivered to their mobile while shopping, 79% also want the option to virtually try on clothes while shopping and 86% want their mobile to alert them when they are near a store that’s selling recommended or sought-after items. 80% would also be interested in a digital wallet (which would also be great for virtual coupon delivery).
The largest current demand for mobile apps is access to coupons and comparison shopping, but that’s not going to last forever. There are places where mobile and retailers are falling short of customer expectations. Those who want to control the market and become what Facebook is to social media, but within the mobile shopping realm, need to take notice. It’s not enough to deliver mobile shopping apps that offer just the basics anymore. As needs expand you have to rise to meet those needs. The ones that start now will gain and retain more customers, not to mention set the bar for others. It’s time to get motivated and step up your game.
Journalism CPR
Tags: boring headlines, branding news sources, decline of newspapers, expand own journalism education, journalism education not important, journalism is dead, journalism schools behind times, linking between news sources important, mobile can revitalize print, reviving journalism
911, what is your emergency? Journalism is dying. Wait, that’s not entirely correct. It’s more like journalism has flatlined. Lately there have been lots of articles out there about how journalism appears to be flailing. There are lots of finger pointers and they are all pointing in different directions. One source says that headlines are boring, another blames journalism curriculum and another counters that by challenging students to broaden their own education. Only a few sources even attempt to pose a resolution and those are centered on mobile. However, it’s going to take more than mobile. In order to revive journalism it’s going to take a combination that targets all of these. With that, I give you my problem/solution guide to reviving journalism.
1) Problem: Boring Headlines: Connor Friedersdorf’s article: “Maybe This Is Why Newspapers Are Failing: Boring Headlines” addresses the problem of, well, boring headlines
http://bit.ly/P7H7TQ
. What’s surprising is he doesn’t focus on the writing as the cause. Instead it’s that there are space constraints, uninteresting stories and restrictions imposed by editors.
Solution: Part of it is the writing, whether anyone admits it or not. I highly doubt editors squash and drain all creative efforts. To address the writing, there are many ways to play around with words, similes, metaphors, alliteration, a reference to a work of popular culture such as a song or a movie, etc. I find it hard to believe there’s no room for that to be incorporated and I feel that, combined with sticking to shorter headlines (i.e. six words or less), would greatly help the cause.
2) Problem: Journalism Education: Some argue that universities are to blame for not keeping up with industry changes. Bill Cotterell is of the opinion that anyone can be taught the basics, like the five W’s, in a short amount of time and the rest is learned through trial and error
http://bit.ly/SSbONI
. According to him, all it takes is someone inquisitive and curious with a broad range of knowledge (by that he means, economics, politics, science, business, history and liberal arts). Oh, and a love of reading.
Solution: While this may be true, it all boils down to being responsible for broadening your own education outside of traditional journalism curriculum, which is what Robert Hernandez advocates in his article
http://bit.ly/PHiMH2
. There’s something to be said in any job for having a range of knowledge and skills, and teaching yourself additional skills is viewed as a plus. Journalism could benefit from more journalists approaching the industry this way.
3) Problem: Outdated Format: Stephane Pere points out that mobile could lead the way to a rebirth of print media
http://bit.ly/Qp2MLy
. I tend to agree, in that I see all forms of media as interconnecting (like a Venn diagram) where each leads to the other. All forms work together. Pere cites an eMarketer study that shows that last year adults spent more time with mobile than print media.
Solution: More people are starting to look to mobile for news during their down time and there are opportunities to strengthen news brands (broadcast and print) by always linking from one of their sources to another. For example, a newscaster can give its station’s Twitter name and Facebook link out and prompt people to engage them there, and they can post their on air news times on those sites to connect the circle. A newspaper can include its site address and can offer a mobile version of that address as well in the paper. Ultimately, print will be read whether it’s on mobile or on paper and each source leads the reader from one to the other.
Journalism is a valuable element of society. It serves to connect its readers, viewers and listeners to the world while connecting the world back to them. There are many forms, but print is the original. You know what they say, you can’t beat the original. The problems and solutions I outlined are the real combination that needs to be addressed. You can’t place sole blame on one aspect of the whole and expect to solve the situation. It’s time to take action and work at reviving journalism from all of these angles. All of this finger-pointing? It just gets us nowhere.